SaaS Commentary
Please comment on Software as a Service (current state and future viability).
At the risk of placing myself firmly in the pantheon of IT curmudgeons, I think that SaaS is another new name for an old concept. In 1993, we referred to this sort of thing as an outsourced or hosted application (admittedly not particularly sexy names). IT lexicon purists may split hairs over the use of a common code base, but fundamentally it’s the same thing.
In my view, SaaS is simply another way to add a particular business capability. There are certain conditions where it makes sense to adopt this approach. For highly differentiated capabilities, it probably isn’t a good option. For more standardized capabilities, it is. Lower investment and speed of implementation are also generally considered as advantages for SaaS solutions.
There are other considerations as well that would be built into a scorecard that would be used to rate the suitability of a SaaS solution versus other options. Again, it’s all about what you are trying to accomplish and what that means about how you should do it.
Obviously, SaaS is and has been a viable option for provisioning capabilities. In the future, my opinion is that it will most likely be subsumed into the larger utility or cloud computing category.
-
Archives
- November 2009 (1)
- September 2009 (1)
- August 2009 (1)
- July 2009 (2)
- May 2009 (1)
- April 2009 (1)
- March 2009 (1)
- February 2009 (3)
- January 2009 (5)
- December 2008 (4)
- November 2008 (1)
- October 2008 (5)
-
Categories
- BCC
- BES
- Blog Question
- Business Value Discovery
- CEO Questions
- Change
- CIO Role
- Cloud Computing
- Cost
- CTO
- Culture & Values
- Decision Making Authority
- Enterprise Architecture
- FAQ Query
- GSA
- Housekeeping
- Introduction
- Investment
- IT Roles
- MADI
- OCM
- Operations
- Political
- Problem
- Request
- SaaS
- SOA
- Solution
- Solutions Delivery
- Supply and Demand
- Transformation
- Value
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS

